We are Open 08.00am-10.00pm
Cartridge Conflict – .270 Win Versus 6.5 Greedmoor

The .270 Win. has achieved overall affirmation by competitor as a result of its delicate demeanor and lethal potential. With shots from 100 to 150 grains, it gets level bearing together with moderate kickback. Rates can polish off 3,000 fps with a 140-grain slug without extending limits, and since the cartridge showed up during the 1920s, it has reliably remained a respectably renowned projectile.

In 2007, Hornady's Dave Emary and champion shooter Dennis Demille arranged a 6.5 competition cartridge considering the .30 T/C. Rather than its parent cartridge, the 6.5 Creedmoor won fans in a hurry. While it was a challenge 45-70 ammo  by plan - mating long, high-BC wind-kicking shots with a short, capable case and low power - the 6.5 Creedmoor quickly transformed into a half breed round.

There's a ton of get over between the .270 and 6.5 in the field. The Creedmoor uses shots from 95 to 160 grains, the .270 with slugs from 100 to 150 grains, so there are more decisions with the 6.5.

Be that as it may, the .270 Win. partakes in an advantage with 6.5 creedmoor ammunition to sheer speed and energy. With a 140-grain shot, the 6.5 Creedmoor fights to show up at 2,725 fps, however the .270 Win. can without a doubt top 2,900 fps and could really break 3,000. However, the extra speed and energy requires more powder, a more long action, and the result is a heavier gun that makes more power.

Notwithstanding, gag speed is only a solitary piece of a cartridge that can perform at longer ranges. You ought to moreover ponder a shot's ballistic coefficient, and the 6.5 Creedmoor has the strategic position there. The 129-grain Hornady InterBond 6.5 slug has a BC of .485 stood out from the 130-grain .270 Between Bond's .460; the 140-grain 6.5 SST's.520 BC rules the 140-grain .270.

SST's figure of .495. That thinks about to less wind float, and the long, significant 6.5

shot's high sectional thickness infers a Greedmoor shot inferred for hunting will enter significant to drop significant game. The Creedmoor is in like manner an eminently capable cartridge plan. With 140-grain shots the 6.5 Creedmoor achieves 2,700 fps with 42.3 grains of Half breed 100V powder or 42.8 grains of Winchester 760.

To achieve that identical speed with a .270, you'll require 49.2 and 50.3 grains of powder, independently. It's more reasonable, appropriately, to reload the Creedmoor, with respect to powder usage. Likewise, but the .270 Win. is hardly to be seen as a significant pulling back round, it makes around 15% more power than the shy 6.5 Creedmoor, as well as more gag influence.

Basically every centerfire ammunition creator offers something like one weight for the .270 Win.; the comparable can't be said for the 6.5 Creedmoor-fundamentally not yet. In this way, essentially every manual rifle made offers a .270 variety, regardless of the way that makers like Savage and Searing are adding rifles stacked in 6.5 Creedmoor reliably.

If the cartidge's course continues, it might be as comprehensively available in the future as the.270, but for the second the Winchester cartridge remains the more ubiquitous choice. To the extent that utilization on deer-size game, both of these cartridges will work outstandingly to longer ranges.

On greater game like elk, the .270 Win. partakes in the advantage. Expecting you acknowledge the proverb that it takes 2,000 ft.- lbs. of energy to kill a bull, then, at that point, the .270 passes that level of energy with most loads on to roughly 300 yards while the ordinary 6.5 Creedmoor load falls under that number some place in the scope of 100 and 200 yards.

If you don't handload, the .270 is reasonable a prevalent decision fundamentally considering the way that rifles and ammo are everywhere. On the off chance that you handload, you can take advantage of the wide grouping of 6.5 slugs. Essential concern is that these two cartridges will function admirably for you, and hanging the maxim "disappointment" on conceivably one is boundless."

.270 WIN.


Better execution at moderate ranges

Broad history on game

Tremendous ammo, rifle decision


Requires longer movement, heavier rifle

Makes more power than the 6.5

Not as unbelievable part slug decision



Short-movement rifles and low power

Splendid BC and SD figures

Logically more gun, ammo choices


Not as convincing on elk-size game

Ammo still not for the most part available

Future not cut in stone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *